@article{Frederiksen1970a, year = {1970}, journal = {Publication of the Faculty of Sciences University, J.E. Purkyne, Brno}, volume = {47}, pages = {89-94}, author = {Frederiksen, W.}, title = {\textit{Citrobacter koseri} (n. sp.), a new species within the genus \textit{Citrobacter}, with a comment on the taxonomic position of \textit{Citrobacter intermedium} (Werkman and Gillen).} } @article{YoungEtAl1971a, year = {1971}, journal = {International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology}, volume = {21}, pages = {58-63}, author = {Young, V.M. and Kenton, D.M. and Hobbs, B.J. and Moody, M.R.}, title = {\textit{Levinea}, a new genus of the family \textit{Enterobacteriaceae}.}, doi = {10.1099/00207713-21-1-58}, issue = {1} } @incollection{Farmeriii1981b, year = {1981}, booktitle = {The procaryotes, a handbook on habitats, isolation, and identification of bacteria}, publisher = {Springer-Verlag}, address = {Berlin}, editor = {Starr, M.P. and et al}, author = {Farmer Iii, J.J.}, title = {The genus \textit{Citrobacter}.}, pages = {1140-1147} } @article{YoungEtAl1971a, year = {1971}, journal = {International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology}, volume = {21}, pages = {58-63}, author = {Young, V.M. and Kenton, D.M. and Hobbs, B.J. and Moody, M.R.}, title = {\textit{Levinea}, a new genus of the family \textit{Enterobacteriaceae}.}, doi = {10.1099/00207713-21-1-58}, issue = {1} } @article{LeminorEtAl1970a, year = {1970}, journal = {Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris)}, volume = {119}, pages = {206-210}, author = {Le Minor, L. and Rohde, R. and Taylor, J.}, title = {[Nomenclature of \textit{Salmonella}].}, issue = {2}, pmid = {5459083} } @article{LeminorEtAl1982a, year = {1982}, journal = {Ann. Microbiol.}, volume = {133B}, pages = {245-254}, author = {Le Minor, L. and Véron, M. and Popoff, M.}, title = {Proposition pour une nomenclature des \textit{Salmonella}.} } @article{LeminorPopoff1987a, year = {1987}, journal = {Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.}, volume = {37}, pages = {465-468}, author = {Le Minor, L. and Popoff, M.Y.}, title = {Request for an Opinion. Designation of \textit{Salmonella enterica} sp. nov., nom. rev., as the type and only species of the genus \textit{Salmonella}.}, doi = {10.1099/00207713-37-4-465}, issue = {4} } @article{Brenner1984g, year = {1984}, journal = {International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology}, volume = {34}, pages = {243-244}, author = {Brenner, D.}, title = {International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology. Subcommittee on Taxonomy of the \textit{Enterobacteriaceae}}, doi = {10.1099/00207713-34-2-243}, issue = {2} } @article{LeminorEtAl1982a, year = {1982}, journal = {Ann. Microbiol.}, volume = {133B}, pages = {245-254}, author = {Le Minor, L. and Véron, M. and Popoff, M.}, title = {Proposition pour une nomenclature des \textit{Salmonella}.} } @article{LeminorPopoff1987a, year = {1987}, journal = {Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.}, volume = {37}, pages = {465-468}, author = {Le Minor, L. and Popoff, M.Y.}, title = {Request for an Opinion. Designation of \textit{Salmonella enterica} sp. nov., nom. rev., as the type and only species of the genus \textit{Salmonella}.}, doi = {10.1099/00207713-37-4-465}, issue = {4} } @article{LeminorEtAl1986a, year = {1986}, journal = {Ann Inst Pasteur Microbiol}, volume = {137B}, pages = {211-217}, author = {Le Minor, L. and Popoff, M.Y. and Laurent, B. and Hermant, D.}, title = {[Characterization of a 7th subspecies of \textit{Salmonella}: \textit{S. choleraesuis} subsp. \textit{indica} subsp. nov].}, abstract = {A new \textit{Salmonella} subspecies designated as \textit{S. choleraesuis} subsp. \textit{indica} (shortly, subspecies VI) was delineated on the basis of biochemical characters and genomic relatedness. Eight serovars were assigned to this subspecies: one of these was previously classified in subspecies I (serovar Ferlac) and seven in subspecies II. This subspecies can be identified by five biochemical characters: gelatinase+, malonate-, L(+)tartrate-, salicin- and sorbitol-. The type strain is CIP 102501 (serovar 1,6,14,25:a:e,n,x formerly called Ferlac).}, doi = {10.1016/s0769-2609(86)80110-7}, issue = {2}, pmid = {3689588} } @article{LeminorPopoff1987a, year = {1987}, journal = {Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.}, volume = {37}, pages = {465-468}, author = {Le Minor, L. and Popoff, M.Y.}, title = {Request for an Opinion. Designation of \textit{Salmonella enterica} sp. nov., nom. rev., as the type and only species of the genus \textit{Salmonella}.}, doi = {10.1099/00207713-37-4-465}, issue = {4} } @article{HoffmannEtAl2005c, year = {2005}, journal = {J Clin Microbiol}, volume = {43}, pages = {3297-3303}, author = {Hoffmann, H. and Stindl, S. and Ludwig, W. and Stumpf, A. and Mehlen, A. and Monget, D. and Pierard, D. and Ziesing, S. and Heesemann, J. and Roggenkamp, A. and Schleifer, K.H.}, title = {\textit{Enterobacter hormaechei} subsp. \textit{oharae} subsp. nov., \textit{E. hormaechei} subsp. \textit{hormaechei} comb. nov., and \textit{E. hormaechei} subsp. \textit{steigerwaltii} subsp. nov., three new subspecies of clinical importance.}, abstract = {Six species and six additional genovars are combined within the so-called \textit{Enterobacter cloacae} complex, with one of them being the species \textit{Enterobacter hormaechei}. In a recent population genetic study, two genetic clusters were found in close phylogenetic proximity to the genetic cluster of \textit{E. hormaechei}. In order to prove the hypothesis that these three genetic clusters belong to the same species, we performed cross-hybridization experiments in microplates with DNAs of representatives of each genetic cluster. The close phylogenetic relationship among the clusters was reflected by their relatively low deltaT(m) values, ranging from 0.3 to 4.8, confirming the hypothesis that the clusters are parts of the same species. These clusters can be distinguished from the other species of the \textit{E. cloacae} complex, which have deltaT(m) values of 5.6 to 10.3. Forty-eight \textit{E. hormaechei} strains from the different genetic clusters were phenotypically characterized with 129 biochemical tests. In this way, \textit{E. hormaechei} could be differentiated from the other species of the \textit{E. cloacae} complex because it tests negative in the 3-hydroxy-butyrate test. The three genetic clusters of \textit{E. hormaechei} could also be differentiated from each other by using phenotypic tests. Hence, we propose three new subspecies of \textit{E. hormaechei} corresponding to genetic clusters VI, VII, and VIII of the \textit{E. cloacae} complex. \textit{E. hormaechei} subsp. \textit{hormaechei} comb. nov. corresponds to the original species description, as it gives negative results for the adonitol, d-arabitol, d-sorbitol, and d-melibiose tests and a positive result for the dulcitol test. \textit{E. hormaechei} subsp. \textit{oharae} subsp. nov. gives negative results for the dulcitol, adonitol, and d-arabitol tests and positive results for the d-sorbitol and d-melibiose tests. \textit{E. hormaechei} subsp. \textit{steigerwaltii} subsp. nov. gives a negative result for the dulcitol test and positive results for the adonitol, d-arabitol, d-sorbitol, and d-melibiose tests. Among the members of the \textit{E. cloacae} complex, \textit{E. hormaechei} seems to be the species most frequently recovered from clinical specimens.}, doi = {10.1128/JCM.43.7.3297-3303.2005}, issue = {7}, pmid = {16000451} } @article{HoffmannEtAl2005c, year = {2005}, journal = {J Clin Microbiol}, volume = {43}, pages = {3297-3303}, author = {Hoffmann, H. and Stindl, S. and Ludwig, W. and Stumpf, A. and Mehlen, A. and Monget, D. and Pierard, D. and Ziesing, S. and Heesemann, J. and Roggenkamp, A. and Schleifer, K.H.}, title = {\textit{Enterobacter hormaechei} subsp. \textit{oharae} subsp. nov., \textit{E. hormaechei} subsp. \textit{hormaechei} comb. nov., and \textit{E. hormaechei} subsp. \textit{steigerwaltii} subsp. nov., three new subspecies of clinical importance.}, abstract = {Six species and six additional genovars are combined within the so-called \textit{Enterobacter cloacae} complex, with one of them being the species \textit{Enterobacter hormaechei}. In a recent population genetic study, two genetic clusters were found in close phylogenetic proximity to the genetic cluster of \textit{E. hormaechei}. In order to prove the hypothesis that these three genetic clusters belong to the same species, we performed cross-hybridization experiments in microplates with DNAs of representatives of each genetic cluster. The close phylogenetic relationship among the clusters was reflected by their relatively low deltaT(m) values, ranging from 0.3 to 4.8, confirming the hypothesis that the clusters are parts of the same species. These clusters can be distinguished from the other species of the \textit{E. cloacae} complex, which have deltaT(m) values of 5.6 to 10.3. Forty-eight \textit{E. hormaechei} strains from the different genetic clusters were phenotypically characterized with 129 biochemical tests. In this way, \textit{E. hormaechei} could be differentiated from the other species of the \textit{E. cloacae} complex because it tests negative in the 3-hydroxy-butyrate test. The three genetic clusters of \textit{E. hormaechei} could also be differentiated from each other by using phenotypic tests. Hence, we propose three new subspecies of \textit{E. hormaechei} corresponding to genetic clusters VI, VII, and VIII of the \textit{E. cloacae} complex. \textit{E. hormaechei} subsp. \textit{hormaechei} comb. nov. corresponds to the original species description, as it gives negative results for the adonitol, d-arabitol, d-sorbitol, and d-melibiose tests and a positive result for the dulcitol test. \textit{E. hormaechei} subsp. \textit{oharae} subsp. nov. gives negative results for the dulcitol, adonitol, and d-arabitol tests and positive results for the d-sorbitol and d-melibiose tests. \textit{E. hormaechei} subsp. \textit{steigerwaltii} subsp. nov. gives a negative result for the dulcitol test and positive results for the adonitol, d-arabitol, d-sorbitol, and d-melibiose tests. Among the members of the \textit{E. cloacae} complex, \textit{E. hormaechei} seems to be the species most frequently recovered from clinical specimens.}, doi = {10.1128/JCM.43.7.3297-3303.2005}, issue = {7}, pmid = {16000451} } @article{LeminorEtAl1982a, year = {1982}, journal = {Ann. Microbiol.}, volume = {133B}, pages = {245-254}, author = {Le Minor, L. and Véron, M. and Popoff, M.}, title = {Proposition pour une nomenclature des \textit{Salmonella}.} } @article{LeminorPopoff1987a, year = {1987}, journal = {Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.}, volume = {37}, pages = {465-468}, author = {Le Minor, L. and Popoff, M.Y.}, title = {Request for an Opinion. Designation of \textit{Salmonella enterica} sp. nov., nom. rev., as the type and only species of the genus \textit{Salmonella}.}, doi = {10.1099/00207713-37-4-465}, issue = {4} } @incollection{Borman1957a, year = {1957}, booktitle = {Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 7th edition}, publisher = {The Williams & Wilkins Co}, address = {Baltimore}, editor = {Breed, R.S. and Murray, E.G.D. and Smith, N.R.}, author = {Borman, E.K.}, title = {Genus IV. \textit{Paracolobactrum} Borman et al., 1944,}, pages = {346-348} } @incollection{Kauffmann1964a, year = {1964}, booktitle = {The world problem of salmonellosis}, publisher = {Junk Publications}, address = {The Hague}, editor = {Van Oye, E.}, author = {Kauffmann, F.}, title = {Das Kauffmann-White-Schema.}, pages = {21-46} } @article{HataEtAl2016a, year = {2016}, journal = {Microbiol Immunol}, volume = {60}, pages = {303-311}, author = {Hata, H. and Natori, T. and Mizuno, T. and Kanazawa, I. and Eldesouky, I. and Hayashi, M. and Miyata, M. and Fukunaga, H. and Ohji, S. and Hosoyama, A. and Aono, E. and Yamazoe, A. and Tsuchikane, K. and Fujita, N. and Ezaki, T.}, title = {Phylogenetics of family \textit{Enterobacteriaceae} and proposal to reclassify \textit{Escherichia hermannii} and \textit{Salmonella subterranea} as \textit{Atlantibacter hermannii} and \textit{Atlantibacter subterranea} gen. nov., comb. nov.}, abstract = {Multilocus sequence analysis based on hypervariable housekeeping proteins was utilized to differentiate closely related species in the family \textit{Enterobacteriaceae}. Of 150 housekeeping proteins, the top 10 hypervariable proteins were selected and concatenated to obtain distance data. Distances between concatenated proteins within the family were 0.9-41.2%, whereas the 16S rRNA and atpD-gyrB-infB-rpoB concatenated sequence (4MLSA) distances were 0.8-6.0% and 0.9-22.1%, respectively. These data indicate that phylogenetic analysis by concatenation of hypervariable proteins is a powerful tool for discriminating species in the family \textit{Enterobacteriaceae}. To confirm the discriminatory power of the 10 chosen concatenated hypervariable proteins (C10HKP), phylogenetic trees based on C10HKP, 4MLSA, and the 16S rRNA gene were constructed. Comparison of average bootstrap values among C10HKP, 4MLSA and 16S rRNA genes indicated that the C10HKP tree was the most reliable. Location via the C10HKP tree was consistent with existing assignments for almost all species in the family \textit{Enterobacteriaceae}. However, the C10HKP tree suggested that several species (including \textit{Enterobacter massiliensis}, \textit{Escherichia vulneris}, \textit{Escherichia hermannii}, and \textit{Salmonella subterranea}) should be reassigned to different clusters than those defined in previous analyses. Furthermore, \textit{E. hermannii} and \textit{S. subterranea} appeared to fall onto a branch independent from those occupied by the other \textit{Enterobacteriaceae}. Therefore, we propose \textit{Atlantibacter} gen. nov., such that \textit{E. hermannii} and \textit{S. subterranea} would be transferred to genus \textit{Atlantibacter} as \textit{Atlantibacter hermannii}, comb. nov. and \textit{Atlantibacter subterranea}. comb. nov., respectively.}, doi = {10.1111/1348-0421.12374}, issue = {5}, pmid = {26970508} } @article{ShelobolinaEtAl2004b, year = {2004}, journal = {Appl Environ Microbiol}, volume = {70}, pages = {2959-2965}, author = {Shelobolina, E.S. and Sullivan, S.A. and O'Neill, K.R. and Nevin, K.P. and Lovley, D.R.}, title = {Isolation, characterization, and U(VI)-reducing potential of a facultatively anaerobic, acid-resistant \textit{Bacterium} from Low-pH, nitrate- and U(VI)-contaminated subsurface sediment and description of \textit{Salmonella subterranea} sp. nov.}, abstract = {A facultatively anaerobic, acid-resistant bacterium, designated strain FRCl, was isolated from a low-pH, nitrate- and U(VI)-contaminated subsurface sediment at site FW-024 at the Natural and Accelerated Bioremediation Research Field Research Center in Oak Ridge, Tenn. Strain FRCl was enriched at pH 4.5 in minimal medium with nitrate as the electron acceptor, hydrogen as the electron donor, and acetate as the carbon source. Clones with 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequences identical to the sequence of strain FRCl were also detected in a U(VI)-reducing enrichment culture derived from the same sediment. Cells of strain FRCl were gram-negative motile regular rods 2.0 to 3.4 micro m long and 0.7 to 0.9 microm in diameter. Strain FRCl was positive for indole production, by the methyl red test, and for ornithine decarboxylase; it was negative by the Voges-Proskauer test (for acetylmethylcarbinol production), for urea hydrolysis, for arginine dihydrolase, for lysine decarboxylase, for phenylalanine deaminase, for H(2)S production, and for gelatin hydrolysis. Strain FRCl was capable of using O(2), NO(3)(-), S(2)O(3)(2-), fumarate, and malate as terminal electron acceptors and of reducing U(VI) in the cell suspension. Analysis of the 16S rDNA sequence of the isolate indicated that this strain was 96.4% similar to \textit{Salmonella bongori} and 96.3% similar to \textit{Enterobacter cloacae}. Physiological and phylogenetic analyses suggested that strain FRCl belongs to the genus \textit{Salmonella} and represents a new species, \textit{Salmonella subterranea} sp. nov.}, doi = {10.1128/aem.70.5.2959-2965.2004}, issue = {5}, pmid = {15128557} } @article{LeminorEtAl1982a, year = {1982}, journal = {Ann. Microbiol.}, volume = {133B}, pages = {245-254}, author = {Le Minor, L. and Véron, M. and Popoff, M.}, title = {Proposition pour une nomenclature des \textit{Salmonella}.} } @article{Smith1894a, year = {1894}, journal = {Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Animal Industry}, volume = {6}, pages = {6-40}, author = {Smith, T.}, title = {The hog-cholera group of bacteria.} } @article{Weldin1927a, year = {1927}, journal = {Iowa State Journal of Science}, volume = {1}, pages = {121-197}, author = {Weldin, J.C.}, title = {The colon-typhoid group of bacteria and related forms. Relationships and classification.} } @article{LiuEtAl2015s, year = {2015}, journal = {Int J Syst Evol Microbiol}, volume = {65}, pages = {2130-2134}, author = {Liu, S. and Jin, D. and Lan, R. and Wang, Y. and Meng, Q. and Dai, H. and Lu, S. and Hu, S. and Xu, J.}, title = {\textit{Escherichia marmotae} sp. nov., isolated from faeces of Marmota himalayana.}, abstract = {The taxonomic position of a group of seven closely related lactose-negative enterobacterial strains, which were isolated from fresh faecal samples of Marmota himalayana collected from the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau, China, was determined by using a polyphasic approach. Cells were Gram-reaction-negative, non-sporulating, non-motile, short rods (0.5-1 x 1-2.5 mum). By 16S rRNA gene sequences, the representative strain, HT073016\textsuperscript{T}, showed highest similarity values with \textit{Escherichia fergusonii} ATCC 35469\textsuperscript{T} at 99.3%, \textit{Escherichia coli} ATCC 11775\textsuperscript{T} at 99.2%, \textit{Escherichia albertii} LMG 20976\textsuperscript{T} at 98.9%, \textit{Escherichia hermannii} CIP 103176\textsuperscript{T} at 98.4%, and \textit{Escherichia vulneris} ATCC 33821\textsuperscript{T} at 97.7%. Phylogenetic analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that the seven strains formed a monophyletic group with five other species of the genus \textit{Escherichia}. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization studies between strain HT073016\textsuperscript{T} and five other species of the genus \textit{Escherichia} showed that it shared less than 70% DNA-DNA relatedness with all known species of the genus \textit{Escherichia}, supporting the novel species status of the strain. The DNA G+C content of strain HT073016\textsuperscript{T} was 53.8 mol%. On the basis of phenotypic and phylogenetic characteristics, strain HT073016\textsuperscript{T} and the six other HT073016\textsuperscript{T}-like strains were clearly distinct from the type strains of other recognized species of the genus \textit{Escherichia} and represent a novel species of the genus \textit{Escherichia}, for which the name \textit{Escherichia marmotae} sp. nov. is proposed, with HT073016\textsuperscript{T} ( = CGMCC 1.12862\textsuperscript{T} = DSM 28771\textsuperscript{T}) as the type strain.}, doi = {10.1099/ijs.0.000228}, issue = {7}, pmid = {25851592} } @article{GuEtAl2014a, year = {2014}, journal = {Int J Syst Evol Microbiol}, volume = {64}, pages = {2650-2656}, author = {Gu, C.T. and Li, C.Y. and Yang, L.J. and Huo, G.C.}, title = {\textit{Enterobacter xiangfangensis} sp. nov., isolated from Chinese traditional sourdough, and reclassification of \textit{Enterobacter sacchari} Zhu et al. 2013 as \textit{Kosakonia sacchari} comb. nov.}, abstract = {A Gram-stain-negative bacterial strain, 10-17\textsuperscript{T}, was isolated from traditional sourdough in Heilongjiang Province, China. The bacterium was characterized by a polyphasic approach, including 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, RNA polymerase beta subunit (rpoB) gene sequence analysis, DNA gyrase (gyrB) gene sequence analysis, initiation translation factor 2 (infB) gene sequence analysis, ATP synthase beta subunit (atpD) gene sequence analysis, fatty acid methyl ester analysis, determination of DNA G+C content, DNA-DNA hybridization and an analysis of phenotypic features. Strain 10-17\textsuperscript{T} was phylogenetically related to \textit{Enterobacter hormaechei} CIP 103441\textsuperscript{T}, \textit{Enterobacter cancerogenus} LMG 2693\textsuperscript{T}, \textit{Enterobacter asburiae} JCM 6051\textsuperscript{T}, \textit{Enterobacter mori} LMG 25706\textsuperscript{T}, \textit{Enterobacter ludwigii} EN-119\textsuperscript{T} and \textit{Leclercia adecarboxylata} LMG 2803\textsuperscript{T}, having 99.5%, 99.3%, 98.7%, 98.5%, 98.4% and 98.4% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity, respectively. On the basis of polyphasic characterization data obtained in the present study, a novel species, \textit{Enterobacter xiangfangensis} sp. nov., is proposed and the type strain is 10-17\textsuperscript{T} ( = LMG 27195\textsuperscript{T} = NCIMB 14836\textsuperscript{T} = CCUG 62994\textsuperscript{T}). \textit{Enterobacter sacchari} Zhu et al. 2013 was reclassified as \textit{Kosakonia sacchari} comb. nov. on the basis of 16S rRNA, rpoB, gyrB, infB and atpD gene sequence analysis and the type strain is strain SP1\textsuperscript{T}( = CGMCC 1.12102\textsuperscript{T} = LMG 26783\textsuperscript{T}).}, doi = {10.1099/ijs.0.064709-0}, issue = {8}, pmid = {24824638} } @article{SuttonEtAl2018a, year = {2018}, journal = {F1000Res}, volume = {7}, pages = {521}, author = {Sutton, G.G. and Brinkac, L.M. and Clarke, T.H. and Fouts, D.E.}, title = {\textit{Enterobacter hormaechei} subsp. \textit{hoffmannii} subsp. nov., \textit{Enterobacter hormaechei} subsp. \textit{xiangfangensis} comb. nov., \textit{Enterobacter roggenkampii} sp. nov., and \textit{Enterobacter muelleri} is a later heterotypic synonym of \textit{Enterobacter asburiae} based on computational analysis of sequenced \textit{Enterobacter} genomes.}, doi = {10.12688/f1000research.14566.2} } @article{HoffmannEtAl2005a, year = {2005}, journal = {Syst Appl Microbiol}, volume = {28}, pages = {196-205}, author = {Hoffmann, H. and Stindl, S. and Ludwig, W. and Stumpf, A. and Mehlen, A. and Heesemann, J. and Monget, D. and Schleifer, K.H. and Roggenkamp, A.}, title = {Reassignment of enterobacter dissolvens to \textit{Enterobacter cloacae} as \textit{E. cloacae} subspecies dissolvens comb. nov. and emended description of \textit{Enterobacter asburiae} and \textit{Enterobacter kobei}.}, abstract = {The taxonomic position of \textit{Enterobacter dissolvens} was re-evaluated based on the analysis of the type strain ATCC 23373T and three clinical isolates. The strains were assigned to the genetic cluster of the species by phylogenetic sequence analysis in the frame of a recent population genetic study. The relatedness of E. dissolves to the other species of the \textit{E. cloacae} complex was analyzed by DNA-DNA hybridization studies based on melting profiles in microplates. The genetic cluster of \textit{E. dissolvens} fell into the same DNA-relatedness group like \textit{E. cloacae} with mean deltaTm-values of 3.9 degrees C confirming the hybridization results of three former studies. Phenotypic analysis of the \textit{E. cloacae} and \textit{E. dissolvens} strains, respectively, based on 115 biochemical reactions yielded the esculin test as the only one differentiating between them by being positive for \textit{E. dissolvens} and negative for \textit{E. cloacae} strains. The name \textit{E. cloacae} subsp. \textit{dissolvens} comb. nov. is proposed for the group of organisms formerly referred to as \textit{E. dissolvens}, and the name \textit{E. cloacae} subsp. \textit{cloacae} comb. nov. for the group of organisms formerly referred to as \textit{E. cloacae}. The species descriptions of \textit{Enterobacter kobei} and \textit{Enterobacter asburiae} were emended based on the data collected on 17 and 15 strains, respectively. The strains were assigned to the respective species by a combination of phylogenetic sequence analyzes and DNA-DNA hybridizations. Phenotypic analyzes of 115 reactions gave detailed species profiles with new differentiating phenotypic properties.}, doi = {10.1016/j.syapm.2004.12.010}, issue = {3}, pmid = {15900966} } @article{HormaecheEdwards1960a, year = {1960}, journal = {International Bulletin of Bacteriological Nomenclature and Taxonomy}, volume = {10}, pages = {71-74}, author = {Hormaeche, E. and Edwards, P.R.}, title = {A proposed genus \textit{Enterobacter}.}, doi = {10.1099/0096266x-10-2-71} } @book{CastellaniChalmers1919s, author = {Castellani, A. and Chalmers, A.J.}, year = {1919}, title = {A Manual of Tropical Medicine. 3rd ed}, publisher = {William Wood and Co}, address = {New York} } @book{LehmannNeumann1896b, author = {Lehmann, K.B. and Neumann, R.}, year = {1896}, title = {Atlas und Grundriss der Bakteriologie und Lehrbuch der speziellen bakteriologischen Diagnostik. Teil 2: Text, 1st ed.}, publisher = {J.F. Lehmann}, address = {München} } @incollection{Jordan1890a, year = {1890}, booktitle = {A report of the biological work of the Lawrence Experiment Station, including an account of methods employed and results obtained in the microscopical and bacteriological investigation of sewage and water. Report on water supply and sewerage (Part II). Report of the Massachusetts Board of Public Health}, publisher = {Massachusetts Board of Public Health}, address = {Boston}, editor = {Sedgewick, W.T.}, author = {Jordan, E.O.}, title = {A report on certain species of bacteria observed in sewage.}, pages = {821-844} } @article{LeminorPopoff1987a, year = {1987}, journal = {Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.}, volume = {37}, pages = {465-468}, author = {Le Minor, L. and Popoff, M.Y.}, title = {Request for an Opinion. Designation of \textit{Salmonella enterica} sp. nov., nom. rev., as the type and only species of the genus \textit{Salmonella}.}, doi = {10.1099/00207713-37-4-465}, issue = {4} } @article{Loeffler1892a, year = {1892}, journal = {Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, Parasitenkunde, Infektionskrankheiten und Hygiene, Abteilung I}, volume = {11}, pages = {129-141}, author = {Loeffler, F.}, title = {Über Epidemieen unter den im hygienischen Institut zu Greifswald gehaltenen Mäusen und über die Bekämpfung der Feldmausplage.} } @book{CastellaniChalmers1919a, author = {Castellani, A. and Chalmers, A.J.}, year = {1919}, title = {Manual of Tropical Medicine, 3rd ed.}, publisher = {Williams Wood and Co.}, address = {New York} } @article{Gaertner1888b, year = {1888}, journal = {Korrespondenzblatt des Allgemeinen ärztlichen Vereins von Thüringen}, volume = {17}, pages = {573-600}, author = {Gaertner, E.}, title = {Über die Fleischvergiftung in Frankenhausen a. Kyffh. und der Erreger derselben.} } @book{CastellaniChalmers1919a, author = {Castellani, A. and Chalmers, A.J.}, year = {1919}, title = {Manual of Tropical Medicine, 3rd ed.}, publisher = {Williams Wood and Co.}, address = {New York} } @article{Loeffler1892a, year = {1892}, journal = {Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, Parasitenkunde, Infektionskrankheiten und Hygiene, Abteilung I}, volume = {11}, pages = {129-141}, author = {Loeffler, F.}, title = {Über Epidemieen unter den im hygienischen Institut zu Greifswald gehaltenen Mäusen und über die Bekämpfung der Feldmausplage.} } @book{CastellaniChalmers1919a, author = {Castellani, A. and Chalmers, A.J.}, year = {1919}, title = {Manual of Tropical Medicine, 3rd ed.}, publisher = {Williams Wood and Co.}, address = {New York} } @article{Levine1920a, year = {1920}, journal = {Journal of Infectious Diseases}, volume = {27}, pages = {31-39}, author = {Levine, M.}, title = {Dysentery and allied bacilli.}, doi = {10.1093/infdis/27.1.31} } @article{Weldin1927a, year = {1927}, journal = {Iowa State Journal of Science}, volume = {1}, pages = {121-197}, author = {Weldin, J.C.}, title = {The colon-typhoid group of bacteria and related forms. Relationships and classification.} } @article{LeminorEtAl1982a, year = {1982}, journal = {Ann. Microbiol.}, volume = {133B}, pages = {245-254}, author = {Le Minor, L. and Véron, M. and Popoff, M.}, title = {Proposition pour une nomenclature des \textit{Salmonella}.} } @article{LeminorPopoff1987a, year = {1987}, journal = {Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.}, volume = {37}, pages = {465-468}, author = {Le Minor, L. and Popoff, M.Y.}, title = {Request for an Opinion. Designation of \textit{Salmonella enterica} sp. nov., nom. rev., as the type and only species of the genus \textit{Salmonella}.}, doi = {10.1099/00207713-37-4-465}, issue = {4} } @article{ReevesEtAl1989a, year = {1989}, journal = {J Clin Microbiol}, volume = {27}, pages = {313-320}, author = {Reeves, M.W. and Evins, G.M. and Heiba, A.A. and Plikaytis, B.D. and Farmer, J.J.}, title = {Clonal nature of \textit{Salmonella typhi} and its genetic relatedness to other salmonellae as shown by multilocus enzyme electrophoresis, and proposal of \textit{Salmonella bongori} comb. nov.}, abstract = {Crude cell extracts of 26 isolates of \textit{Salmonella} serotype typhi (\textit{S. typhi}) and 48 other \textit{Salmonella} isolates representing 28 serotypes and seven DNA hybridization subgroups were analyzed for electrophoretic variants of 24 metabolic enzymes by starch gel electrophoresis. All strains of \textit{S. typhi} had identical isoenzyme patterns, indicating that they were a single clone. All of the enzymes detected in the remaining strains were polymorphic, and the degree of genetic variation was quite high. The average number of alleles per enzyme locus was 4.7, and the mean genetic diversity per locus was 0.556. Thirty-two distinct allele profiles, or electrophoretic types (ETs), were found in these 48 strains of \textit{Salmonella} serotypes other than \textit{S. typhi}. Analysis of the genetic relationships of the ETs to each other showed that, with one exception, the ETs formed subgroups that were consistent with the subgroupings based on DNA hybridization studies. ET profiles were not always linked to specific serologic patterns. These data show that multilocus enzyme electrophoresis has a potential application in epidemiologic and taxonomic studies of salmonellae, although it is not differential for \textit{S. typhi}. We also propose a new species, \textit{Salmonella bongori} comb. nov., a new combination base on the elevation of \textit{Salmonella choleraesuis} subsp. \textit{bongori} to the level of species.}, doi = {10.1128/jcm.27.2.313-320.1989}, issue = {2}, pmid = {2915026} }